Friday, March 28, 2014

Noah, On The IMAX

www.thevirtualpew.com
As I drove up to the largest IMAX theater in the world I saw on the primary Marquee listings for the movies, Noah, God's not Dead, and Jesus Son of God. Writing for Hollywood Jesus, Spirituality in Film, and The Virtual Pew as I do, I am not ignorant of the influx of Christian themed films at present. Neither am I oblivious to the controversies, both the real, perceived and imaginary. The biggest story regarding movie releases on this day, is the release of Noah. 

Word has it, and there is good indication it is true, that the director of Noah, Darren Aronofsky and the studios went back and forth with the studios recently doing a final edit to appease the Christian audience of this classic tale from the Bible. Aronofsky, according to some, isn't happy with the final results and then there are the criticisms that have come about by some that the character of Noah is too liberal, cares too much for the environment, is an animal lover and the story as portrayed on screen is an environmentalist tale. A notation here is the Biblical account in reality lasts only from Genesis 5:32-10:1. With the movie lasting approximately 2 1/2 hours, there is clearly some dramatic license.

It is likely Noah will offend many Christians, not so much other Christians or religious groups, yet, at the same time, entertain those wanting to see an action based movie. I suspect for example that what appears to be the giant rock monsters, resembling the rock monster from the classic children's movie The NeverEnding Story, in Noah (types of angels or protectors in Noah) along with all of the action, many will think this story resembles more of The Lord of the Rings than it does a Bible story. While those things didn't bother me, (I love the parts of the Bible that actually does talk about Giants, Angels, Demons, Monsters and the like) there are troubling aspects of the movie not included in the Biblical narrative, that in my opinion wasn't needed and took away from the moral themes. 

www.mosaicwichita.com
Now let me be blunt, I think a huge mistake was made when the powers that be tried to adapt the final version of Noah into a film that appeased and pleased the Christian audience. The flood narrative, whether one believes in the flood histories or not, is a part of the narrative of many religions. The story of Noah as we know it, isn't just a Christian story, it is a part of the story of Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Whether one agrees with the narrative though, the themes and lessons are valuable ones that should entice all people, despite what their religious beliefs are or aren't. 

Noah has a star studded cast with dramatic, albeit, sometimes a let down at times, special effects. The cast consists of Russell Crowe as Noah, Jennifer Connelly as Noah's wife Naameh, Ray Winstone as Tubal-cain, Anthony Hopkins as Methuselah, and others such as Ema Watson, Nick Nolte, and the list goes on. The cast is actually very good especially Connelly. The special effects as a whole are also quite good although there are lapses at times. I was disappointed in the sound in the movie, at times, blaring and overbearing the dialog.  It was also interesting to look at early history humans with the ultra dirty hands but such pristine white teeth. The editing and story is also choppy and the final product on screen leaves far too many questions and the intent of what the story is trying to tell isn't clear at all. I don't blame the director Aronofsky, I have made comment before and will again, I want to see his version of the film.


Now all of this said, don't take my comments wrong, the movie is entertaining, but I left the movie confused and still find myself confused as to its intent. I also wonder will the movie do more harm than good in regards to getting people to understand this Bible story. While there are things I liked about the movie, unfortunately, some of those are things that apparently many attempted to have either taken out of the movie, or the themes of the movie redirected all together.

www.thevirtualpew.com
Noah in the outset is clearly an individual who cares for the animals of the planet, and in fact, the planet. For those who have studied the Bible, this is often referred to as The Genesis Mandate. There is a concept or belief among many that God wants the people of this planet to care for the animals and plants of the planet, not simply abuse them for their own pleasure. While they are here for us, they are not here for us to abuse. I thought the movie in a gentle way showed this side of Noah and did not feel that it was inappropriate in anyway. The confusion comes about as Noah, primarily through dreams, and what appears to be the usage of certain drugs goes into hallucinogenic states or visions and hears from God, or what we suspect is hearing from God regarding the destruction of the earth and the building of the Ark. We are never clear on this point but it is clear, there is a God or Creator involved, we see miracles take place including ultimately the floods. All through the process Noah is troubled, what is he hearing from the Creator? What is the purpose of the flood? Those things are never really made clear, although an attempt is made to give explanation as to the objective of good and evil towards the end of the movie. 

Another aspect I liked is the inclusion of the supernatural, including what is hinted at in part, in the  
www.thevirtualpew.com
first part of Genesis 6 and other places in the Old Testament. The presentation of the supernatural in the movie is a concept that I think will get more people to read about the instances in the Bible to see what is real as opposed to what is presented on a movie screen. I think many will be shocked at some of the liberties taken in the movies, yet will also be shocked at some of the realities included in the Bible.

There are components of the film that I did not like, I will be honest, I am not so sure if I dislike them because of the way they were presented, or the apparent conclusions that one can come to regarding the characters. Noah for example is not a likeable character at all.  He will do all he can to save the planet but will leave an entrapped woman fleeing for safety to be trampled to death. While many are shown to be evil in society there are also the abused, especially women who are nothing more than sex slaves, the poor who are abused, entrapped and imprisoned. Noah struggles with the message he has heard from God, which seems to be inconsistent with the Biblical account. He is even willing to sacrifice his own family, while we have a scene that resembles in some way the story of Abraham and Isaac, while the end result is the same, there seems to be no clear voice from God to move him in the direction he moves. That all said, there are also worthy questions to ask ourselves, how do any of us deal with the reality around us in times of stress or in the places where hard decisions have to be made? Do we listen to our own convictions and for those of us who pray, do we listen for the direction and voice of God in giving that direction?

www.mosaicwichita.comThere is another component that many will have issue with, that is a God who is willing to destroy the whole of the planet. Here I am not as troubled though, I have no problem personally with a God who could create the universe having standards, guidelines and expectations for that creation. It is a simple concept really that many will take offense at, but I realized a long time ago, I am not God!  I have no right, nor do I have the ability to dictate to God, the things that God would choose to do. That said, my belief is also appreciative that God would provide a provision to make it possible for all people on earth to experience the joy and hope provided by God, to be in relationship with Him through the gift of his son Jesus. Many will not see that as an answer, there are many theological discussions that one could go through here but in its simplest form, the conclusion of the story of Noah, from a Biblical narrative, is not the rainbow, but it is the ultimate sacrifice, resurrection, and eternity provided for all followers of Jesus through Jesus death on the cross. 

I was anxiously awaiting this movie, truth is, I left the theater leaving disappointed and confused. As mentioned earlier, I don't blame the director Aronofsky, I haven't seen the movie he made, I saw a movie that seemed to be from the press, chopped and edited to appease a select audience. While some are giving this film the highest of praise, I just can't do that as I have a responsibility to share my thoughts with those who read my reviews. I honestly don't know what to think and was actually very disappointed. While an enjoyable movie to watch, it is like watching an overly edited version of The Lord of the Rings, that is highly intense, (far to intense for a young child, a friend with a young daughter, around 10, had to leave the theater early on due to its intensity,) and simply put, confusing as to what the plot objectives are for the movie. If looking for an interesting take on the story of Noah, one is encouraged to read the actual Biblical narrative and discuss the themes of a just, and yet, jealous God or a discussion on how we hear from God there can be some positive aspects to the film. My final conclusion though, many Christians, Jews, and Muslims who follow and have as a part of their faith system Noah, will be disappointed. Others, who enjoy good and entertaining fantasy will like this film, not that Noah is fantasy but that is the way it comes across. It will be interesting to hear the take of others on this, and I for one, anxiously look forward to reading them.  I will say, to save you some money, I would have loved to have seen this movie in 3-D, that option isn't available. Seeing it on the IMAX is available, that said, save yourself some extra money, there is no redeeming value in my opinion of having to pay the extra price to see it on the IMAX screen.  

Over the years I have rated my films on a scale of 1 - 10.  This one, I am just not sure about, while parts I liked, there were parts I didn't like, some things were entertaining, other things were disturbing. As a story though, as a film with technical merits, I have to say on a scale of 1 - 10, for the feelings of neutrality on this one, I give a rather disappointing 5. 

To see the trailer for the movie Noah, just click on the following video, if the video doesn't appear, just click on the following link:




The Virtual Pew and our other work is supported solely by the kind contributions of others. You can click on the donate button below to give any amount to this work that does so much more than just post articles on the net; I draw no ongoing salary from the church I pastor, Mosaic Wichita which is predominantly a homeless church; I am grateful for any small amount you can contribute to help with this ministry.  Believe me there is much more going on than most realize. I will also provide information to verify the ministry and income that comes into this ministry and work.  Thanks and feel free to share any material from The Virtual Pew, I only ask that appropriate credit is given and a link to the original site with the materials provided.


Click here to read about, and order the book, The Keystone Kid 

http://www.mosaicwichita.com/#!store
Click here to visit the web page The Virtual Pew

Click here to follow The Virtual Pew on Twitter

Mike Furches on Faceboook.

Click here to visit Mosaic Church where Mike is Pastor

The Keystone Kid/Virtual Pew Message Boards

Click to subscribe to my blog

There are hundreds of postings so make sure to check out the archives. You can also contact me for a free audio book link of The Keystone Kid at mike@furches.org You can visit http://www.thevirtualpew.com/.

Hopefully you will consider a gift to The Virtual Pew.

Now I get asked this quite often, Can we repost your blogs or articles? The short answer to that is, what an honor that you would ask, and by all means, spread the word. Here is our contact information

The Virtual Pew
1249 N. St. Francis
Wichita Kansas, 67214
Email: mike@furches.org

Click on the following links to learn more about The Virtual Pew

Donations to The Virtual Pew

The Virtual Pew Blog

Personal Furches Web Site

Hollywood Jesus

Reviews With Mike

The Virtual Pew Sermons

The Virtual Pew News


Thursday, March 20, 2014

Amistad, Freedom Through The Cross

www.mosaicwichita.com
Lent for me is a time of reflection, a time to draw close to the creator of the universe.  Of course for quite a few years now movies have had an impact on me, often causing me to reflect, not just on the realities in my life but also on the sacrifices others have made to better the lives of others. I first posted my thoughts about this Amistad in 1997 and again in 2001, to this day, the images of sacrifice and the power of Christ to instill hope and purpose are still relevant for me. 

 The story follows the story of an African named Cinque, from the days of his freedom in Africa, his capture, the horrible form of transport across the ocean to America where he lives as a slave. The ship he and others are shipped on is named the Amistad. The horrors experienced on the Amistad and the way people are treated are unimaginable. This superbly directed classic by Steven Spielberg, brings the viewer to the realization that true freedom can be experienced by even those in chains. We see freedom is more than a condition of our living, it is a concept contained within the heart and mind.

Djimon Hounsou playing the part of Cinque is absolutely brilliant in this role, also terrific is Anthony Hopkins as John Quincy Adams. There is terrific cinematography and this film is among the few that I ever rated a 10 on a scale of 1 - 10, it still stands up, and after all of these years, is still just as powerful for me now as it was the first time I saw it in 1997.  The direction by Steven Spielberg is one of the reasons many see Spielberg as one of the great American Directors of all time.  There is an absolutely compelling and touching script and the surrounding actors from Hounsou, Hopkins, Morgan Freeman, Matthew McConaughey and many others are fabulous.

www.thevirtualpew.com During Lent I want and seek the reminders of the power of the Cross, the power of Jesus love. Amistad doesn't hint at those things, it slams the power of the cross and the gospel in ones face just as solidly and assuredly as the Roman Centurion driving the nails into Jesus hands and feet. There is clearly salvation, while not necessarily a circumstantial salvation, but certainly a spiritual salvation that offers freedom and more for those surrendering to the Son of God who gave his life for all of us on the cross. We are in fact reminded, it is often those who are having struggles that can identify with Christ because of the struggles and journey He went through. 

There are many in life having difficulty, yet, history is strewn with examples of those who have struggled, few likely more than the slaves in early American history, yet, despise those struggles, there is the example of Jesus which many relate to, accept and receive. It was his undying love in spite of the difficulty he faced for even those who would do him harm that others learned of true love.


www.thevirtualpew.com
For those who struggle, take the time this season to once again watch Amistad, if you haven't seen it, find a way to watch it, I promise, not only will you be inspired, but you will be reminded that even in tough times, the message of the cross is relevant for the hurting, even if that hurting person is you. This is a great movie, likely the best to never win an Oscar although it was nominated for 4 of them. Be moved and during the season of Lent, reflect on the sacrifice of Jesus for all people, including those who are abused, hurt, and rejected by society. In that love, Jesus shows his ability to love all people, and this movie is as good of a representation of that love as you may ever see. While many may see this review from me as a tad different, maybe even more like a sermon, watch the movie, you will see, everything touched on here, is touched on in the movie with the characters portrayed.  You will see, how a movie like Amistad is in reality, more than a movie, it is a sermon on the power of freedom as presented specifically, in the movie, by the sacrifices that Jesus made on the Via Dolorosa.

The following is the trailer for Amistad, to see it, just click on the video link, if the video doesn't appear or there are problems, click on the following link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJFDOvGMD0U



The Virtual Pew and our other work is supported solely by the kind contributions of others. You can click on the donate button below to give any amount to this work that does so much more than just post articles on the net; I draw no ongoing salary from the church I pastor, Mosaic Wichita which is predominantly a homeless church; I am grateful for any small amount you can contribute to help with this ministry.  Believe me there is much more going on than most realize. I will also provide information to verify the ministry and income that comes into this ministry and work.  Thanks and feel free to share any material from The Virtual Pew, I only ask that appropriate credit is given and a link to the original site with the materials provided.


Click here to read about, and order the book, The Keystone Kid 

http://www.mosaicwichita.com/#!store
Click here to visit the web page The Virtual Pew

Click here to follow The Virtual Pew on Twitter

Mike Furches on Faceboook.

Click here to visit Mosaic Church where Mike is Pastor

The Keystone Kid/Virtual Pew Message Boards

Click to subscribe to my blog

There are hundreds of postings so make sure to check out the archives. You can also contact me for a free audio book link of The Keystone Kid at mike@furches.org You can visit http://www.thevirtualpew.com/.

Hopefully you will consider a gift to The Virtual Pew.

Now I get asked this quite often, Can we repost your blogs or articles? The short answer to that is, what an honor that you would ask, and by all means, spread the word. Here is our contact information

The Virtual Pew
1249 N. St. Francis
Wichita Kansas, 67214
Email: mike@furches.org

Click on the following links to learn more about The Virtual Pew

Donations to The Virtual Pew

The Virtual Pew Blog

Personal Furches Web Site

Hollywood Jesus

Reviews With Mike

The Virtual Pew Sermons

The Virtual Pew News


Monday, March 3, 2014

Interview with David Leo Schultz, The Man Behind The Rich Mullins Movie, Ragamuffin


www.thevirtualpew.com
Over the last year or so I had questions regarding the movie Ragamuffin The Rich Mullins Story. I had friends and people I knew who were involved with Rich over the years. Some on a close level.  I wanted to ask David Leo Schultz one of those questions, pointedly and didn't know if I would ever get that chance to address some of the controversy.  I was blessed to finally get to ask some questions of David, the director, screenwriter and man behind the movie, albeit not the way I wanted but I was pleased that he answered even some of the hard questions I asked him.  There have been some harsh things said about the film, and the lack of involvement of some people in the process.  Most of those in the past from people who knew Rich closely, I gave several of those individuals an opportunity to respond to the responses of David, as of this posting, only a few of those people responded.  The one person I wanted to know their thoughts of the most did not respond.  I will gladly post their response if they provide it at a later date but after waiting some time, I am deciding to go ahead and post the interview for The Virtual Pew and Hollywood Jesus.  While I would like to have heard specifically more of the complaints addressed by some of those having issues with the film, I have tried to take my journalistic responsibilities seriously, along with my responsibility as a follower of Jesus. I actually think David's response to the first question, citing Matthew 18 is a valid response on his part.  As to what is truth regarding what some have said and what is said in this interview, I cannot answer that, what I can answer though, is opportunities for response were provided.  I still value all of those involved, many who worked with Rich, managed him, played music with him.  I also found value in the movie where my original thoughts and views can be seen at the following links.  That said, here is the interview I did with David Leo Schultz, the man behind the movie Ragamuffin. 

My original review of Ragamuffin at Hollywood Jesus 


Mike Furches, (MF): David here are the questions I was going to ask.  I was excited about finally getting to speak to you after numerous attempts but will be honest, a little disappointing here in having to send in my questions in advance like this. 

www.mosaicwichita.comDavid Leo Schultz, (DLS): Sorry Mike. I'm holding on for dear life over here. I'm hoping to get out to Wichita and meet up with Jim Smith in May, maybe we could get a coffee or a beer when I'm in town.

MF: Here are my questions though, and if possible for follow up appreciated.  By the way, while some of the questions will be pointed, if you noticed my review of the film outside of several issues was actually very positive, it is seldom I give a  movie a review of over 7 on a scale of 1 - 10, for the potential value of this film and the impact it could have on many I gave it a 9 and mentioned you personally quite highly. 

DLS: Mike thank you for the kind review. I appreciate that.  My responses to your questions below.

MF: Now the questions:  One of the controversies that keeps coming up from those who knew  Rich, some who worked with him, band mates, and even his long time manager Gay Quisenberry is they were either not contacted at all regarding the research for the film, or had very minimal contact.  Can you tell us some as to your reasoning for this, and how the story line was actually developed?

DLS: I'd be happy to respond.  First, I'd encourage anyone that has a problem with me can contact me directly. Especially if they are a brother or sister in Christ. That's a Matthew 18 thing. First go to the brother ya know...Things like this can quickly fall down the slope of he said, she said, and gossip/slander issues can easily rise. So we should be cautious here. Secondly, let me say that when I was 9 years old my cousin committed suicide. He was 28. He was like a father to me. If someone one day came to me and said they wanted to make a movie about my cousin, how I would respond might even depend on the day they asked. One day I might say sure, the other day I might say no. I don't think it's a bad thing or a good thing, but more of a personal thing. I'll start with Gay & David (Beaker) Strasser. They were two of the first I reached out to. I never received a response back from Beaker. Eventually Julie, his wife reached out via facebook. We've been very friendly through facebook. Someone sent me one of her facebook posts saying that we reached out for them to be involved, and they declined. Before I met the ragamuffin band I had already reached out to Gay, and then after meeting Jimmy Abegg he encouraged me to reach out again to Gay. I did, and she did respond this time, but also declined to be involved. There were quite a few people I sent messages to, but never heard back. Regarding his band mates through the years, he had many. I'm sure there are some I don't even know about, but if you mean the ragamuffins, I had the priveledge and the honor to meet all of them.  Actually if you ever get a chance to see the doc we made (Rich Mullins: A Ragamuffin's Legacy) you can see interviews we did with some of them for the purposes of research. We even sent Jimmy Abegg a few of the scripts during the screenwriting process. Two, if I remember correctly. One in the very early stages (a very rough script) and I believe a draft pretty close to us shooting. The reason we did with Jimmy is because he specifically asked to be included in the process. If some others wanted to be more involved I wish I had known, I would have loved that. It could be possible with some I didn't even know they existed. I swear, every time I turn around there is someone else who I never had heard of that was one of Rich's best friends. It seems to me that Rich had such a vast life. Before I ever set out to write the script, or hire a writer, or any of that I did research. Matter of fact the process took about 8 months all together. It wasn't easy, because I pretty much had to play detective. I had to track people down, and follow leads, the whole bit. I started with interviewing Rich's family Dave, Sharon, Debbie, Llyod, Brennan Manning, Lee & Nikki Lundgren, James Bryan Smith, Mitch Mcvicker and a few other kid brothers like Eric Hauk & Michael Aukofer. I also met some of Rich's best friends from college till his death like Kathy Sprinkle, Sam Howard, Gary Rowe, and Elizabeth Lutz etc...We made the entire movie in collaboration with Rich Mullins family, and Dave Mullins (Rich's bro) was our on set consultant for the movie. I actually shared final cut of the movie with the family. That was a decision made, for me, even before I met Dave Mullins. It's something I offered up in our first meeting. But I didn't come in with an agenda, but more of a hope that the story would echo the gospel of JESUS. I had some ideas, but I just wanted to learn, and Dave Mullins was great about it to. He didn't try to fill in the blanks for anybody else. He said, here's the piece that I know, but for these other pieces of the puzzle you'll have to go and find them. All I can say is I tried my best. I talked with anybody that wanted to talk with me. If anyone wanted to be involved more than they were, that's honestly news to me, because even after 20 years of being a fan, and the 8 months of research, and 3 1/2 years of making the movie I love hearing Rich Mullins stories. It's just something I don't get tired of. That's the long story. The short story is: I did the best I could with what I had. I talked to as many people as I could, that I could find, and that would talk to me. I only stopped when I felt like I found the story, the story that would become the movie. One more thing: If I hurt anyone's feelings in the process, that wasn't my intention to leave anyone out, and I'm sorry. I tried my best.

www.thekeystonekid.org
MF: You have directed a largely unknown cast, yet you pull out some rather convincing performances, how did you do this and can you tell us some about that process.

DLS: Well, I couldn't have done it, it we didn't already have a talented cast. I didn't give them talent. That's something they came to the table with. Again, it's not perfect. There's moments within my own acting that I watch and go, "yuck", but pretty much the question I would constantly ask when I was directing was, "Do I believe this?" If I felt like I had a take where it felt really honest. I moved on. If it wasn't I tended to do more takes. I tend to be a director to work really closely with the actors, especially when it comes to personalization's and coaching. It probably bothered some actors, but I think some enjoyed it.

MF: You chose to go with a musician to play the part of Rich, Mike Koch who did a very good job at capturing part of the demeanor of Rich, can you tell us some about the process of casting Mike?

DLS: Sure. I knew Mike in College. He and I were both big fans of Rich & Brennan Manning. We would sit in waffle house for hours drinking coffee quoting both of them. It was actually mike that gave me my first copy of Ragamuffin Gospel.  We even met Brennan for the first time together. We all went to Perkins together and had pie. Then after college we lost touch. We didn't talk for 10 years. When I thought this movie might become a reality I thought I'd reach out to him to have him  play a song. Then he was in town, so we did lunch, and I asked him to audition, because we just couldn't find anybody yet. We had one Hollywood actor, who really loved the script but could make his schedule work with his TV show. We had mike and the other actors do a monologue & song of rich's from one of his concerts, and he was just absolutely amazing. We did a final test of sorts in LA, with some of our final picks. They were all great. But i just felt mike had that Rich essence in his own personality as well as nailing the audition.

MF: I was impressed with the fact that you showed Rich with a lot of his blemishes and all.  While some have been critical of that, most have been supportive and appreciative of showing a huge part of the real Rich.  What was it you hoped to present in the way you presented Rich?

DLS: I just wanted to tell an honest story. Dave Mullins and I said from the beginning that we didn't want to make Rich out to be something he wasn't. Some flawless saint. And for me Rich was one of the first of his time to talk about how he had sins, and brokenness, and pain- I mean, that's why he was my hero. There's this myth in the church that you have to be perfect for Jesus to love you, and ragamuffins like Rich & Brennan break those myths but echoing the gospel with their lives. They weren't perfect. But they continually pressed into Jesus with all their shortcomings, and reminded us all that we are all as Brennan put it, "Loved for who we are, not for who we should be, because none of us are as we should be."

MF: Another thing that has received a little comment from those who knew Rich, including myself, is that Rich could at times be quite quirky and fun to be around. Can you describe why we see very little if any of this in Rich's demeanor in the film as it was something a lot of people recognized in Rich?

DLS: Sure that's a fair question. One, the movie is more a story about his pain versus being a story about his joy. Two, this was actually something we attempted at times, but we felt like we kept falling short, and so better to cut it than to put it in.  Again Rich was so vast, this incredible song writer, musician, insightful, a poet, a thinker, funny, deep...on and on...and when we went to cast Rich it was like well...good luck and even though Mike was amazing, I think there was short term experienced grief I had right after I cast Mike. Not because he wasn't the best choice, because I think he was...but because I realized I was looking for Rich Mullins to play Rich Mullins. Rich was one of a kind. So yeah I actually agree with you that I wish we had that quirky fun thing, that child likeness thing in there...but when you go back and watch it, since we cover 35 years, we had moments in the montages and other small moments where we showd that side of him. But again we knew up front that there was no way to fit 42 years into a 2 hour movie. It's not the only story of Rich Mullins. There are many stories of Rich Mullins. He lived too big of a life for there to just be one. This is just one of them.

MF: Another area that I seemed to understand from my viewing at the World Premiere was there   There was an almost laissez-fair comment that the film is what it is and that you wished people left the movie just feeling okay or something along those lines.  What exactly is it that you want people to get from the film.
didn't seem to be much of an interest in presenting the film at larger venues or to see it be as big as it could be.

www.thevirtualpew.com
DLS: Yeah, I'm not sure you interpreted that correctly. Or You did and I communicated it, at the time, incorrectly. One of the two. One of the things I do remember saying was that I hope people watch the movie, then forget about the movie and fall in love with Jesus. That's my deepest hope for anybody that watches the movie. I meant that. That's truly what I want people to get from the film. There are several people out there that are wondering why we're not doing a theatrical release or larger venues. The truth is that's what we tried first. We shopped the movie around to distributors first, and no body was interested in distributing this movie theatrically. And most people don't know the cost in P&A for a movie that goes into theaters. For most studio movies it's millions. For other smaller movie's it's at the very least it takes A LOT OF MONEY.  We don't have that. There's actually one company out there looking for P&A money for us, and IF they are successful we MIGHT get a 10-15 city theatrical release. We are truly hoping for that to happen, but at this point it's not guaranteed.  That's where the idea for the tour came from, it was out of a desire to at least give people the opportunity to see it that wants to see it. At the time of us first planning our tour we didn't even have a distributor or know if we would get one, or see any sign of it being a reality so we at least wanted people to have some way to see it. It wasn't a substitutionary option, at the time, it was the only option.

MF: Are there future plans for a DVD and can you tell us if there is anything we can expect from the special features?

DLS: Yes we think this movie could have potentially have an exclusive deal with Wal-mart May 6th. But I'm not sure if that's a done deal. So hopefully it will be on blue-ray and DVD in Wal-Marts may 6th.

MF: This is Color Green's first film and your first effort at directing, what have you learned in the process?

DLS: This is actually Color Green's 4th film, but yes it's my first film to direct.

I've learned so much. My other films, in terms of writing and producing, were like going to undergraduate school for film, and this was my masters school. I've learned, as I think most artists do, you got to keep doing it if you want to get better. I'm excited to learn from my mistakes, and go make another movie, and learn from all those mistakes, and go make another movie. This is the assumption of course that I'd be blessed enough to make another movie. Getting to make one movie is like catching lightning in a bottle. The thought of it happening again seems highly unlikely. Of course that's what I thought before I made this movie.

Thanks for letting me share.

Kind Regards,

David Leo Schultz

The following is the video trailer for the movie Ragamuffin, to see the video, just click on the video, if there are problems, click on the following link:





The Virtual Pew and our other work is supported solely by the kind contributions of others. You can click on the donate button below to give any amount to this work that does so much more than just post articles on the net; I draw no ongoing salary from the church I pastor, Mosaic Wichita which is predominantly a homeless church; I am grateful for any small amount you can contribute to help with this ministry.  Believe me there is much more going on than most realize. I will also provide information to verify the ministry and income that comes into this ministry and work.  Thanks and feel free to share any material from The Virtual Pew, I only ask that appropriate credit is given and a link to the original site with the materials provided.


Click here to read about, and order the book, The Keystone Kid 
event:URL[*val*]http:///www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=M876VH8ZDCRLN[*val*]_blank

Click here to visit the web page The Virtual Pew

Click here to follow The Virtual Pew on Twitter

Mike Furches on Faceboook.

Click here to visit Mosaic Church where Mike is Pastor

The Keystone Kid/Virtual Pew Message Boards

Click to subscribe to my blog

There are hundreds of postings so make sure to check out the archives. You can also contact me for a free audio book link of The Keystone Kid at mike@furches.org You can visit http://www.thevirtualpew.com/.

Hopefully you will consider a gift to The Virtual Pew.

Now I get asked this quite often, Can we repost your blogs or articles? The short answer to that is, what an honor that you would ask, and by all means, spread the word. Here is our contact information

The Virtual Pew
1249 N. St. Francis
Wichita Kansas, 67214
Email: mike@furches.org

Click on the following links to learn more about The Virtual Pew

Donations to The Virtual Pew

The Virtual Pew Blog

Personal Furches Web Site

Hollywood Jesus

Reviews With Mike

The Virtual Pew Sermons

The Virtual Pew News